At the same time, the politicians are enacting a law that goes above the EU’s minimum levels of data retention. There have been many attempts at handwashing by saying “The EU forces us to do this”. And this is what the policitians impose on the entire population.ĭeceptions about the EU directive. Tracking somebody’s location is a violation of freedom equivalent to a jail term, in other words, in the eyes of the Swedish justice system. In Sweden, if you’re sentenced to a jail term of less than six months, you get the option of an electronic tracking collar, confining you to move in certain areas (work and home, essentially). That is just so hypocritical, I don’t know where to begin. That same person will vote yes to tracking every citizen’s movement and registering all of their communications if the government wants to use it against them. Just last week, a person from a supposedly liberal party claimed that it is a human right to not inhale smoke at outdoor restaurants (about a possible extension of the ban on smoking). In other words, hiring two new police officers is more effective for fighting crime than this abomination.ĭeceptions and hypocrisy of human rights. Yes, you read that right: zero point zero zero two per cent. (If my current ISP doesn’t adopt the same stance, I will switch in a heartbeat.)Īdditionally, a Germany study concluded that the data retention had only helped on 0.002% of criminal cases. Additionally and honorably, one Swedish ISP – Bahnhof – has already said that it will circumvent the law’s intention while following it to the letter, giving the government no trackability of its customers whatsoever. This hits the ordinary citizen, not organized crime. If I can do it, then of course organized crime can too. Even without that, I can trivially make phonecalls that evade the data retention and internet connections that do. If I don’t want to be tracked, I can do that absolutely trivially – I can just stand outside any McDonald’s, Pressbyrån newskiosk, long-range bus, or any other facility with a free wi-fi and communicate there. Proponents claim that the massive erosion of privacy will be useful for “combating organized crime” anybody who claims so is clinically and medically dumb. This is mind-boggling argumentation, as it costs taxpayers many, many times more to implement the mechanisms of Data Retention that robs all citizens of their privacy.ĭeceptions of effectiveness. Proponents have been claiming that the European Commission will fine Sweden if we don’t introduce the Data Retention Directive, and that it would be an “irresponsible waste of taxpayer money” to not introduce it. There have been attempts at deception of every conceivable kind.ĭeceptions of cost. Its only parallel is when the general wiretapping was introduced in 2008, and I’m pissed off as all hell. This has been one of the most filthy, deceptive political campaigns to introduce a massive Big Brother law I have ever seen. That last part, “from where”, turns your mobile phone into a governmental tracking device that will essentially follow your movements in real time as well as historically. Despite many countries having struck down the directive as utterly incompatible with human rights – all of those who have challenged it, in fact – the Swedish politicians persisted in deception to abolish our most basic rights to privacy, as well as lying through their teeth.ĭata Retention, as implemented in Sweden, basically means that all your communications are logged so that the Police can check whom you have been talking to, when, how, and from where. Swedish Parliament just voted 233-41 to introduce Data Retention in Sweden, as per the EU directive from 2004.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |